--- Log opened Fri Feb 26 00:00:11 2016 01:48 -!- juse [~juse@fow4.kyla.fi] has joined #navit 02:10 #navit: < Simple_> thank you very much :) 02:17 -!- Simple_ [5ec62567@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.198.37.103] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 02:31 -!- xenos1984 [~xenos1984@2001:bb8:2002:200:45a:8541:1bf7:ae2f] has joined #navit 02:58 -!- jskarvad [~jskarvad@redhat/jskarvad] has joined #navit 03:00 -!- jjelen [jjelen@nat/redhat/x-kapcmjaojhsiibyl] has joined #navit 03:36 -!- sea`` [~sea@li1231-75.members.linode.com] has joined #navit 03:36 -!- sea`` [~sea@li1231-75.members.linode.com] has left #navit [] 03:36 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has joined #navit 04:08 -!- jskarvad [~jskarvad@redhat/jskarvad] has quit [Quit: Quit] 04:38 -!- jskarvad [jskarvad@redhat/jskarvad] has joined #navit 04:47 -!- alexhell0xbf [~alexhell@178.70.90.34] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 04:59 -!- jonathanmaw [~jonathanm@82-70-136-246.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #navit 06:34 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 06:48 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has joined #navit 07:41 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 10:47 -!- xenos1984 [~xenos1984@2001:bb8:2002:200:45a:8541:1bf7:ae2f] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 10:52 -!- alexhell0xbf [~alexhell@178.70.90.34] has joined #navit 11:16 -!- jandegr [5bb63086@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.182.48.134] has joined #navit 11:49 -!- xenos1984 [~xenos1984@118-166-191-90.dyn.estpak.ee] has joined #navit 12:14 -!- pini` [~pini@bou-fi.pustule.org] has joined #navit 12:18 -!- rdo`` [~rdo@37.120.169.230] has joined #navit 12:20 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: jjelen, jskarvad, pini, rdo` 12:26 -!- Netsplit over, joins: jskarvad 12:27 -!- jjelen [jjelen@nat/redhat/x-cjacefjegqijbbcz] has joined #navit 12:29 -!- Simple_ [5ec62567@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.198.37.103] has joined #navit 12:32 -!- jjelen [jjelen@nat/redhat/x-cjacefjegqijbbcz] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 12:35 #navit: < Simple_> hi all 12:35 #navit: < Simple_> hi KaZeR 12:55 -!- jonathanmaw [~jonathanm@82-70-136-246.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat] 13:17 -!- rdo`` is now known as rdo` 13:19 #navit: < KaZeR> hi there 13:19 #navit: < KaZeR> hi Simple_ 13:20 -!- mode/#navit [+o KaZeR] by ChanServ 13:39 -!- jskarvad [jskarvad@redhat/jskarvad] has quit [Quit: Quit] 13:56 #navit: < Simple_> KaZer, can u help me again? 13:56 #navit: < Simple_> i've some questions 14:09 #navit: < jandegr> imple you can ask right away without asking, answer can come instantly or sometimes days later :) 14:10 #navit: < jandegr> sorry, imple was to be simple_ 14:43 #navit: < Simple_> ok) 14:43 #navit: < Simple_> What is segment mean? Code says that it is the drivable way. Is that mean we are worked with ready graph ? Is the segment is edge of graph? Where are the segments come? Can the segments pass through rivers, building, etc ? Does the segments stores into osm file, or it is created during coverting osm file into a bin file? 14:47 #navit: < jandegr> maptool splits roads at crossings to store them in a binfile, route.c loads those as edges in the graph 14:48 #navit: < jandegr> you would have one pass throug a river or building if there was such a real life road 14:50 #navit: < jandegr> route.c uses the word 'segment' but they correspond to edges as used in most of the literature 14:50 #navit: < Simple_> got it 14:50 #navit: < Simple_> but where are edges from? 14:51 #navit: < Simple_> does osm provide graph edges? 14:51 #navit: < Simple_> or navIt create it ? 14:52 #navit: < jandegr> have a look at maptool, it converts OSM data into binfile, as those you can download from the mapserver 14:53 #navit: < jandegr> and route.c constructs a graph on the fly from the segments (or edges or roads or whatever name they get), each time you want a new route 14:54 #navit: < Simple_> what moment route.c constructs a graph? 14:54 #navit: < Simple_> when I will get start and end point? 14:55 #navit: < Simple_> and navIt creates bouding rectangle 14:55 #navit: < Simple_> right? 14:55 #navit: < jandegr> route.c jumps into action as soon as both an end and startpoint are set 14:56 #navit: < Simple_> i.e. before this moment, a graph is not exist ? 15:05 #navit: < jandegr> correct 15:11 -!- jandegr [5bb63086@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.182.48.134] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 15:14 -!- juse [~juse@fow4.kyla.fi] has quit [Quit: Nettalk6 - www.ntalk.de] 15:56 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has joined #navit 16:46 -!- alexhell0xbf [~alexhell@178.70.90.34] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 16:47 -!- alexhell0xbf [~alexhell@178.70.78.193] has joined #navit 16:53 #navit: < Simple_> does bin file already has ready segments and navIt just assemble ready vertexes and edges? 17:01 -!- jjelen [~jjelen@ip4-95-82-163-69.cust.nbox.cz] has joined #navit 17:04 #navit: < Simple_> The segments is not intersect buildings, rivers. Who does provide it ? Osm ? or NavIt ? Who does originaly create correct segment ? 17:15 #navit: < Simple_> How does a bin file get attributes like a AF_ONEWAY; AF_SPEED_LIMIT; etc ? 17:16 #navit: < Simple_> Does osm has ready data for it? 17:18 #navit: < Simple_> Some objects like a building, walls, woods have effect to a finish route, right? How does they are considered? 17:19 #navit: < Simple_> What about member of struct "route_graph" - "avoid_seg" ? I guess, this member stores a few unpasseble segments, right? What are they? How does navIt decide, is the segment unpasseble or not? 17:22 #navit: <@KaZeR> segments are provided by osm. maptool converts the osm "ways" into objects that navit will be able to use for routing. buildings, rivers, forests, ... are polygons, hence not routables 17:22 #navit: <@KaZeR> attributes such as AF_ONEWAY are also provided by osm 17:23 #navit: < Simple_> thank you 17:24 #navit: <@KaZeR> there is two factors influencing if a segment is routable or not : the tags that are provided by osm (and converted by maptool) AND the settings such as https://github.com/navit-gps/navit/blob/trunk/navit/navit_shipped.xml#L185-L200 17:24 #navit: <@KaZeR> you're welcome :) 17:24 #navit: <@KaZeR> it would be great if you could add some of the stuffs you learnt to the wiki :D 17:25 #navit: < Simple_> i will be glad to add something to wiki 17:25 #navit: < robertp> Hi Kazer. 17:25 #navit: < Simple_> but my engl is bad 17:25 #navit: < Simple_> need a editor :) 17:26 #navit: < Simple_> an editor ) 17:26 #navit: <@KaZeR> hi robertp 17:27 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: don't worry about your english. if we have content, someone else will review and fix. adding valuable content is the difficult part :) 17:27 #navit: <@KaZeR> look also at https://github.com/navit-gps/navit/blob/trunk/navit/item.c#L45-L55 for usable items definitions 17:27 #navit: < robertp> I've had an idea during a business trip: would it be possible - and easy :) - to make autozoom to zoom at a level where the position and the next intersection is visible? 17:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> btw i'd be happy to review any edit your would like to make if you feel that it would help. ping me anytime ( but i'll be less available next week, vacations) 17:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> robertp: it is possible indeed 17:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> actually there's even a widget to do something like that, although it's not widely used 17:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> need to find it back hang on 17:29 #navit: <@KaZeR> robertp: here you go : https://github.com/navit-gps/navit/blob/trunk/navit/osd/core/osd_core.c#L3769 17:31 #navit: < robertp> Cool, thanks. I'll try it. 17:32 #navit: <@KaZeR> np. it's probably the least documented OSD item :) 17:32 #navit: <@KaZeR> that's a call to edit :D 17:32 #navit: <@KaZeR> http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/OSD 17:34 #navit: < robertp> Mh.. The site doesn't open. That must be a sign... 17:42 #navit: < Simple_> How navIt will do(how many tiles to load? how build a graph? ), if needed to build a route through whole Europe(for example), tens of cities, hundreds of intersections and multiple restrictions and conditions ? And how fast it will be? 17:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> robertp: which site, the wiki ? 17:43 #navit: < robertp> Yes. The forum too. 17:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> robertp: i've heard about issues concerning the forum. i'll look into it now. wiki works for me albeit a bit slow 17:44 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: we should benchmark it :) 17:44 #navit: < Simple_> okay 17:44 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: we actually do have some routing QA 17:44 #navit: <@KaZeR> https://github.com/navit-gps/routing-qa for the tests 17:44 #navit: < robertp> Simple_: If you take a RaspberryPi for a route through europe, it might take ages. 17:45 #navit: < Simple_> nope 17:45 #navit: < robertp> Kazer, it works now. 17:45 #navit: < Simple_> just a PC 17:47 #navit: < Simple_> for example route from Berlin to Praha 17:47 #navit: < Simple_> How much tiles will be load 17:47 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: we will have to find a way to make these datas more easily available, but here's the QA tests output for example : http://pastebin.com/raw/Bj9LWipT 17:47 #navit: < Simple_> i just want to understand mechanism 17:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: navit will load less tiles outside of a given radius around your position and your destination 17:48 #navit: < Simple_> but how navIt build detailed graph? 17:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> because we don't need all details of all the streets in the middle of a 100kms+ route 17:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> if you look at the example i shared in http://pastebin.com/raw/Bj9LWipT 17:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> the last example is the Route66, US 17:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> 3289 kms, routed in 6.94919991493s 17:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> (of course routing speed depends A LOT on your cpu) 17:50 #navit: < Simple_> okay, i see 17:50 #navit: <@KaZeR> alexhell0xbf: if you are around, it reminds me of something i wanted to discuss regarding map download 17:56 #navit: < Simple_> yes, but we need detailed info to build main route? 17:57 #navit: < Simple_> that's why navIt must load max zoom lvl tiles, right? 17:57 #navit: < Simple_> 18 or something else 17:57 #navit: < Simple_> for create detailed graph, Am I right? 17:58 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-198-177-22.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 17:58 #navit: < circleci-bot> No tests: pgrandin's build (#170; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-pages) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/170 17:58 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-198-177-22.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 17:59 #navit: <@KaZeR> Simple_: this is where the different levels of streets kick in for example 18:03 -!- jjelen [~jjelen@ip4-95-82-163-69.cust.nbox.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 18:04 #navit: < Simple_> dont got it :( 18:05 #navit: < Simple_> Is navIt load max zoom(18 or ??) level tiles in selected rectangle? 18:07 #navit: <@KaZeR> for a given area (or position) we have different levels of tiles. example : abcd will contain the whole world. so moslty you'll see informations about oceans and land. 18:07 #navit: <@KaZeR> actually even better. this ticket : http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/456 18:08 #navit: <@KaZeR> there is a lot in it but the key takeway is to compare the pedantic profile with another default profile 18:08 #navit: <@KaZeR> this shows how to use deeper layers tiles to have a more detailed/accurate route calculation 18:09 #navit: <@KaZeR> the default profile is a tradeoff between being fast (so, parsing less segments) and being accurate 18:09 #navit: <@KaZeR> does this make sense? 18:13 -!- robertp [584aaffd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.88.74.175.253] has quit [] 18:18 #navit: < Simple_> okay 18:18 #navit: < Simple_> i will check ticket a little bit later 18:18 #navit: < Simple_> to big arcticle for me :) 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> can u to correct me 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> look 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> for example "whole world" 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> http://i76.fastpic.ru/big/2016/0227/6e/ff48fdad9154dda610f5e4069550dd6e.png 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> than 18:19 #navit: < Simple_> navIt divide in 4 parts 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> right 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> ? 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> and we get the result 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> something like this 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> http://i76.fastpic.ru/big/2016/0227/45/f7cf671c37cea1b1687b8a3a7174d645.png 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> than 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> else 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> zoom 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> http://i76.fastpic.ru/big/2016/0227/1e/7b4523d42a25252b1dfdc1e5b9a43a1e.png 18:20 #navit: < Simple_> and elese 18:21 #navit: < Simple_> oh, mistake - more and more ) 18:21 #navit: < Simple_> http://i76.fastpic.ru/big/2016/0227/de/e35eb6e4349d9b61e251ce6e35aa23de.png 18:21 #navit: < Simple_> another zoomlevel and - more tiles 18:21 #navit: < Simple_> right? 18:22 #navit: < Simple_> and it will be continue until we reach max zoom level 18:22 #navit: < Simple_> it is - 18 level, right? 18:23 #navit: <@KaZeR> yes, you got the idea :) 18:25 #navit: < Simple_> finaly we have huge set of tiles 18:26 #navit: < Simple_> and get detailed info about streets, roads and somethings else in the selected rectangle? 18:27 #navit: <@KaZeR> yes. the deeper the tile, the smaller area it wil cover and the more details it will contain 18:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> actually, here's something fun to try: a binfile is just a zip file 18:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> you can unzip it, and look at the size and organization of the tiles 18:28 #navit: < Simple_> yes 18:28 #navit: < Simple_> i read about that) 18:28 #navit: < Simple_> and try to unzip it 18:30 #navit: <@KaZeR> ok great. here's a proof of concept of an in-place map updater : https://github.com/pgrandin/map_updater/blob/master/updater.rb 18:30 #navit: <@KaZeR> what it does is just compare the checksum of a local tile against a central index. and download a tile to replace the outdated one directly in the zip file if needed 18:34 #navit: < Simple_> okay 18:34 #navit: < Simple_> thank you 18:37 #navit: < Simple_> can u explain me more detailed about "load less datas to speedup the routing" ? 18:40 #navit: < Simple_> "we don't need all details of all the streets in the middle of a 100kms+ route" 18:41 #navit: < Simple_> what do u mean by that? 18:42 #navit: < Simple_> i'm about middle 18:42 #navit: < Simple_> middle of what? 18:46 #navit: <@KaZeR> let's say you want to drive to a place 100 kms away 18:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> the graph will be built using datas for, say, 10 kms around your position at level 18, 20 kms around your position at level 14. same around your destination. in between, we will just need datas from level 10 for example 18:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> numbers are almost random in my example, it's just to explain the ida 18:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> idea 18:48 -!- Horwitz [mich1@baldrian.franken.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 18:48 #navit: <@KaZeR> actually the correct numbers are here : http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/Routing 18:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> Then the graph gets flooded, beginning with the destination. This makes the graph re-useable when the position changes. 18:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> this is actually important. because your destination does not change usually, but your position will change every second 18:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> so everytime we just need to update at worst one segment at the edge of the graph. makes sense? 18:52 #navit: < Simple_> okay, i got it 18:57 #navit: <@KaZeR> great :) 18:58 #navit: < Simple_> I was prepared a picture for understanding subject 18:59 #navit: < Simple_> can u correct me if I understand not correct 18:59 #navit: < Simple_> http://i75.fastpic.ru/big/2016/0227/5b/1c597d1b8bc7eccd6ea956a712682c5b.png 18:59 -!- xenos1984 [~xenos1984@118-166-191-90.dyn.estpak.ee] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 19:00 #navit: < Simple_> black rectangles is "load less datas" 19:00 #navit: < Simple_> and in cities 19:00 #navit: < Simple_> Berlin, Drezden, Praha we have ~18 zoomlevel 19:01 #navit: < Simple_> I was painted it with green circles 19:01 #navit: < Simple_> Am I understand it correct? 19:06 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-159-241-155.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 19:06 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#171; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-pages) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/171 19:06 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-159-241-155.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 19:07 -!- Horwitz [mich1@baldrian.franken.de] has joined #navit 19:07 -!- mode/#navit [+o Horwitz] by ChanServ 19:10 #navit: <@KaZeR> i sense a slight misunderstanding. your picture is a great example actually ( even if your image hosting website isn't ;) ) 19:11 #navit: <@KaZeR> your image is correct IF you have a waypoint in Dresden ( because we need details about the streets around your waypoint 19:11 #navit: <@KaZeR> otherwise, we don't need the details of the streets in Dresden. we'll just use the highway, that will be included in the level 10 anyway 19:11 #navit: <@KaZeR> makes sense? 19:13 #navit: <@KaZeR> the possible misunderstanding : we do not load tiles depending of the type of streets it contains. I mean we do not stop at level 10 because there is only a highway. It works the other way around 19:14 #navit: <@KaZeR> when loading a tile at level 10, you do not know if a tile at level 11 will contain more details ( is there something else than an highway?) 19:14 #navit: <@KaZeR> the only way to know is to actually load the lower level tiles. 19:15 #navit: <@KaZeR> instead we load tiles depending of the level of details we expect to need for the routing. 200 kms between two spots? highways and main roads should be fine. 19:15 #navit: < Simple_> okay 19:15 #navit: < Simple_> start point on the top 19:15 #navit: < Simple_> is berlin 19:15 #navit: < Simple_> and end point at bottom 19:15 #navit: < Simple_> is praha 19:16 #navit: < Simple_> intermediate point is dresden 19:16 -!- Horwitz [mich1@baldrian.franken.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 19:17 #navit: <@KaZeR> by intermediate point, do you mean a waypoint that you define in navit as a waypoint ? 19:17 #navit: < Simple_> what is waypoint? Do u mean a end point? 19:18 #navit: <@KaZeR> let's say you want to drive from berlin to praha, but you are picking up a friend in dresden. you can set praha as being your destination in navit, then add a waypoint in Dresden (search for the address, then click on "visit before" ) 19:19 #navit: <@KaZeR> then navit will route you to dresden, and once you will reach the exact waypoint in dresden it will automatically continue to route you to Praha 19:20 #navit: < Simple_> and if i dont add a waypoint in dresden? 19:20 #navit: < Simple_> but only two points 19:20 #navit: < Simple_> berlin and praha 19:20 #navit: <@KaZeR> this has several useful use cases. picking up someone on the way, setting up a waypoint to avoid a part of the route you don't like, or defining a set of waypoints because you like some specific route. For example, if you want to drive along a scenic route along the ocean 19:20 #navit: < Simple_> how does navIt route me across dresden? 19:21 #navit: <@KaZeR> if you don't add a waypoint in Dresden, the area containing dresden will be loaded as level 10, and you'll probably stay on the highway 19:21 #navit: < Simple_> i have loaded bin file with map 19:21 #navit: <@KaZeR> this is an interesting discussion, i'll definitely setup a page explaining that with some screenshots. maybe we can have some informations being overlayed also in the images generated by the routing QA 19:22 #navit: < Simple_> and try to get route accross few cities, providing only two poins(without waypoints) 19:22 #navit: < Simple_> and i get pretty well result 19:23 #navit: <@KaZeR> great :) 19:23 #navit: < Simple_> route was detailed and trueful 19:24 #navit: < Simple_> you told that if i dont add a waypoint, the area in town will be loaded as level 10 19:25 #navit: < Simple_> but in my case, how navIt knowns about route accross cities, withou loading more detailed tiles? 19:25 #navit: < Simple_> it seems navIt does not need a waypoint 19:25 #navit: < Simple_> to build a graph through cities 19:25 #navit: < Simple_> Am I wrong? 19:26 #navit: <@KaZeR> we usually don't want the route accross cities like Dresden in your example, because instead of leaving the highway and going through the city then back on the highway, most of the time you just want to go via the highway 19:27 #navit: <@KaZeR> it's usually easier and faster 19:27 #navit: < Simple_> yes 19:27 #navit: <@KaZeR> also, keep in mind that the graph is rebuilt while you drive 19:27 #navit: < Simple_> but if the shortes way is through the city? 19:27 #navit: < Simple_> shortest* 19:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> so when you will be near Dresden, it will be your current position, so navit will load more datas in this area 19:28 #navit: < Simple_> BINGO 19:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> :) 19:28 #navit: < Simple_> i finally got it) 19:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> by default, navit does not aim for shortest : it aims for fastest 19:28 #navit: <@KaZeR> (but this is configurable) 19:28 #navit: < Simple_> where is this configuration? 19:29 #navit: < Simple_> how i can find it? 19:30 #navit: <@KaZeR> actually this : https://circle-artifacts.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/169/artifacts/0/tmp/circle-artifacts.oSrlYsn/Fremont_drive_bypass.yamlmetric.png is a good example of a bad use of shortest vs fastest. the yellow road is shorter and technically faster here because you have priority over the other traffic ( no stop sign) but navit routes you via the 2 red streets because yellow is ~30km/h and red is ~40km/h 19:30 #navit: <@KaZeR> you can configure it here : https://github.com/navit-gps/navit/blob/trunk/navit/navit_shipped.xml#L185-L200 19:30 #navit: <@KaZeR> (you can just create your own profile and switch from the gui) 19:31 #navit: <@KaZeR> in my car, i also have a computer so plenty of cpu, and i like to use the car pedantic profile 19:31 #navit: <@KaZeR> you can compare with car_shortest : route_weight is the key here 19:34 #navit: < Simple_> i can configure it by changin "route_weight" value 19:34 #navit: < Simple_> Am I right? 19:38 #navit: < Simple_> oh no 19:38 #navit: < Simple_> i'm wrong 19:38 #navit: < Simple_> just need a lil bit time 19:39 #navit: < Simple_> to gain an understanding 19:39 #navit: < Simple_> thank you very much 19:39 #navit: < Simple_> you are great man ) 19:40 #navit: < Simple_> i will add some info to the wiki page later 19:40 #navit: <@KaZeR> haha thanks my pleasure 19:40 #navit: <@KaZeR> awesome! that's how we will eventually end up with a comprenhensive documentation for new users :) 19:41 #navit: <@KaZeR> btw : i love hearing about new users's setups and comments about usability. so feel free to share more about how you are using Navit, what you like and dislike 19:41 #navit: <@KaZeR> if you'd like to get involved, we're also always looking for volunteers. there's plenty to do :) 19:43 #navit: < Simple_> i will help navIt as I can ) 19:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> great :) 19:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> do you already have some hardware to run on? 19:43 #navit: < Simple_> i was try on PC only 19:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> a great place to start contributing is often the translations : https://translations.launchpad.net/navit 19:43 #navit: <@KaZeR> ok 19:44 #navit: <@KaZeR> are you using the GTK interface or the internal gui ? 19:44 #navit: < Simple_> not sure 19:44 #navit: < Simple_> for now 19:45 #navit: < Simple_> just run navIt.exe :D 19:45 #navit: <@KaZeR> does the menu looks like this? https://wiki.navit-project.org/images/thumb/7/71/InternalGui-MainMenu.png/300px-InternalGui-MainMenu.png 19:48 #navit: < Simple_> yes 19:49 #navit: < Simple_> exactly 19:49 #navit: <@KaZeR> ok. so this in internal. it is mostly intended for touchscreens ( even if it works fine on PC) 19:50 #navit: <@KaZeR> the gtk gui allows you deeper access to debuging informations. you can right click on an item to get details, for example 19:50 #navit: < Simple_> okay 19:51 #navit: < Simple_> is this info stores on wiki page? 19:51 #navit: < Simple_> about gtk 19:52 #navit: <@KaZeR> it should, but maybe we could make it better. try http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/Configuration#Display_Options 19:53 #navit: < Simple_> okay 19:53 #navit: < Simple_> i will check it 19:54 #navit: < Simple_> some offtopic 19:54 #navit: < Simple_> about image hosting web site 19:54 #navit: < Simple_> you told, that mine site is bad 19:54 #navit: < Simple_> i known it 19:54 #navit: < Simple_> my casual image hosting not available for now 19:55 #navit: < Simple_> and i use random site 19:55 #navit: < Simple_> what resources(image, data, hosting) do u use ? 19:57 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-211-141-21.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 19:57 #navit: < circleci-bot> No tests: pgrandin's build (#173; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-pages) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/173 19:57 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-211-141-21.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 19:58 #navit: <@KaZeR> i did not say that it was bad, just that it was erm.. well. i don't know :) 19:59 #navit: <@KaZeR> http://imgur.com/ is a bit less intrusive for example 20:00 #navit: < Simple_> okay, i will be keep it in mind 20:00 #navit: < Simple_> and in my browser`s bookmarks ) 20:01 #navit: < Simple_> where I can find you ? 20:01 #navit: < Simple_> and time range? 20:04 #navit: < Simple_> specify time zone please 20:04 #navit: < Simple_> or we have same time zone 20:04 #navit: < Simple_> this chat shows to me 4 a.m 20:09 #navit: <@KaZeR> you can find me here. if i'm in front of my computer, i usually look at irc. 20:10 #navit: <@KaZeR> it's 5pm for me right now. i'm usually around during week days. sometimes during the week-ends too, but a bit less 20:10 #navit: <@KaZeR> also i won't be online a lot next week, i'll be in vacations. 20:11 #navit: <@KaZeR> but there's other folks who can help you :) most of the users are either in western europe (jandegr, robertp). tryagain is in your timezone i believe. 20:12 #navit: < Simple_> okay 20:12 #navit: < Simple_> thank you 20:13 #navit: < Simple_> at last 20:13 #navit: < Simple_> are u developer of navIt? 20:13 #navit: <@KaZeR> i am indeed. but some other folks can write code wayyy better than i do :) 20:14 #navit: < Simple_> jandegr? 20:14 #navit: < Simple_> robertp? 20:14 #navit: < Simple_> they are developers too? 20:14 #navit: <@KaZeR> clarification : i'm one of the members of the project. we have about 6 active contributors right now i'd say. overall in 10 years, probably 20-30 people contributed 20:14 #navit: <@KaZeR> yes 20:15 #navit: < Simple_> got it 20:15 #navit: < Simple_> thank you very much 20:15 #navit: < Simple_> again 20:15 #navit: < Simple_> for help 20:15 #navit: <@KaZeR> my pleasure :) 20:19 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-161-99-244.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:19 #navit: < circleci-bot> Canceled: pgrandin's build (#176; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/176 20:19 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-161-99-244.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:22 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-221-160-255.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:22 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#175; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/175 20:22 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-221-160-255.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:23 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-196-229-167.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:23 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#177; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/177 20:23 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-196-229-167.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:33 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-216-228.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:33 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#174; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (master) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/174 20:33 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-216-228.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:38 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-23-22-42-182.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:38 #navit: < circleci-bot> Canceled: pgrandin's build (#178; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/178 20:38 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-23-22-42-182.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:39 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-224-80-203.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:39 #navit: < circleci-bot> Canceled: pgrandin's build (#172; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (master) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/172 20:39 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-224-80-203.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:44 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-132-59.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:44 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#179; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/179 20:44 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-132-59.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 20:52 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-211-114-185.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 20:52 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#180; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/180 20:52 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-211-114-185.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 21:25 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-159-45-164.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 21:25 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#182; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/182 21:25 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-159-45-164.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 21:25 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-197-170-169.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 21:25 #navit: < circleci-bot> No tests: pgrandin's build (#185; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-pages) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/185 21:25 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-197-170-169.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 21:27 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-29-255.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 21:27 #navit: < circleci-bot> Failed: pgrandin's build (#183; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/183 21:27 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-157-29-255.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 21:29 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-144-158-38.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 21:29 #navit: < circleci-bot> Fixed: pgrandin's build (#184; push) in navit-gps/routing-qa (master) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/184 21:29 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-144-158-38.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] 21:45 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-167-115-154.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #navit 21:45 #navit: < circleci-bot> Fixed: pgrandin's build (#181; ssh by pgrandin) in navit-gps/routing-qa (gh-tests) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/routing-qa/181 21:45 -!- circleci-bot [~circleci-@ec2-54-167-115-154.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Client Quit] --- Log closed Sat Feb 27 00:00:12 2016