[01:25:44] *** Quits: Horwitz (~mich1@p200300ec9f3c6900022268fffe64e7c4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [02:28:34] *** Joins: Horwitz (~mich1@p200300ec9f01d800022268fffe64e7c4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) [02:28:34] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Horwitz [02:28:34] *** Quits: jkoan (~jkoan@pizarro.uberspace.de) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [02:28:34] *** Quits: NavitLogger (~NavitLogg@pizarro.uberspace.de) (Will I dream?) [02:29:34] *** Joins: NavitLogger (~NavitLogg@pizarro.uberspace.de) [02:29:34] *** Server sets mode: +nrtz [08:53:11] hi all [15:22:10] hi @ilovekiruna [15:51:13] *** Joins: ilovekiruna (~ilovekiru@ip1f129c09.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) [15:51:13] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v ilovekiruna [15:51:21] hi jkoan [15:57:19] Failed: build (#22571; push) in navit-gps/navit (pull/987) -- https://circleci.com/gh/navit-gps/navit/22571?utm_campaign=chatroom-integration&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=irc [18:59:55] @ilovekiruna the VersionCode RP now has the "every 15min"-Format. What are your thoughts about this versus the "every 5min"-Format? [19:16:16] how do we push it down to 5 min? [19:17:44] yyyyMMttFF tt = dd * 3 + HH / 8 FF = (HH % 8) * 12 + mm / 5 [19:18:00] and i dont think this is really readable [20:44:10] have you written that in gh issue? [20:48:22] more or less, yes [23:16:05] I also find it not very intuitive [23:16:28] and I believe this should be the goal of our version scheme [23:16:33] being readable