[13:53:43] *** Joins: web-33 (~web-33@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP)
[15:29:41] *** Quits: web-33 (~web-33@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP) (Connection closed)
[16:12:30] *** Joins: brax (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP)
[16:20:37] <brax> Hi guys,  recently I was wondering about why navit uses a fibonacchi heap instead of a regular binary (or d-ary) heap. So I implemented a d-ary heap myself and tried to replace the fibonacchi heap. I am having two questions/problems about this:
[16:20:37] <brax> 1. In the docs it says that a change of the core component should be discussed with the project leads. Is this the correct place to do so?
[16:20:38] <brax> 2. I wrote a small benchmark that proves my heap to be about twice as fast at inserting  random elements and extracting them. However I'd like to test it with real-world data in navit itself. I can build navit (on linux), but as soon as I try to start a route calculation, the application crashes (even when using the trunk version). Does anyone have
[16:20:38] <brax> advice?
[17:46:05] *** Joins: brax95 (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP)
[17:47:27] *** Quits: brax (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP) (Ping timeout: 90 seconds)
[19:13:28] *** Quits: brax95 (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP) (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds))
[19:15:43] *** Joins: brax (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP)
[19:54:30] *** Quits: brax (~brax@freenode-u8a.85t.gll7q5.IP) (Quit: Page closed)