--- Log opened Thu Oct 02 00:00:56 2014 00:54 -!- KaZeR [~KaZeR@64.201.252.132] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 05:19 -!- woglinde [~henning@ip-109-45-1-1.web.vodafone.de] has joined #navit 06:12 -!- woglinde [~henning@ip-109-45-1-1.web.vodafone.de] has quit [Quit: leaving] 06:52 -!- Robotaxi [3ef5dbf5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.62.245.219.245] has joined #navit 07:30 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #navit 07:43 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 08:59 -!- drlizau [~liz@billiau.net] has joined #navit 11:11 -!- Robotaxi [3ef5dbf5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.62.245.219.245] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 11:12 -!- Robotaxi [3ef5dbf5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.62.245.219.245] has joined #navit 11:58 -!- drlizau [~liz@billiau.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 12:38 -!- woglinde [~henning@fb-n15-11.unbelievable-machine.net] has joined #navit 13:50 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #navit 14:12 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 15:03 -!- KaZeR [~KaZeR@64.201.252.132] has joined #navit 15:03 -!- mode/#navit [+o KaZeR] by ChanServ 15:37 -!- Mineque [~Mineque@ebd76.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #navit 15:38 #navit: < Mineque> hi 15:42 #navit: <@KaZeR> hi Mineque 15:58 -!- Robotaxi [3ef5dbf5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.62.245.219.245] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 16:05 -!- woglinde [~henning@fb-n15-11.unbelievable-machine.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 18:40 -!- jandegr [51f34cab@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.243.76.171] has joined #navit 19:00 -!- mvglasow [5d87adb9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.93.135.173.185] has joined #navit 19:01 #navit: < mvglasow> Hi guys, once more my question: anybody with SVN access around 19:02 #navit: < mvglasow> who could have a look at my patch for #983? 19:16 #navit: <@KaZeR> hey mvglasow 19:16 #navit: < mvglasow> hi KaZeR 19:17 #navit: <@KaZeR> i'll try to review it in a few hours. i am actually setting up a CI, applying this patch ( which solves a crash ) would be a perfect test 19:20 #navit: < mvglasow> great, thanks 19:30 -!- tryagain [~quassel@178.216.76.36] has joined #navit 19:36 #navit: < tryagain> mvglasow i've tested your #983 patch with osd button, with gtk_drawing_area graphics. Works fine for button placement, if button has use_overlay="1". 19:36 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #navit 19:37 #navit: < mvglasow> tryagain that's good news, thanks for testing 19:38 #navit: < tryagain> but percent sized button image becomes noize after resize 19:38 #navit: < tryagain> and no effect on use_overlay="0" buttons 19:39 #navit: < tryagain> they simply appear to have zero coordinate specified in percent 19:39 #navit: < tryagain> do you have same behaviour? 19:41 #navit: < mvglasow> tryagain I'll test that and get back to you 19:41 #navit: < tryagain> ah, and percent sized button with use_overlay="1" appears in default size before i resize the window 19:41 -!- Mineque_ [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #navit 19:42 -!- Mineque_ is now known as Guest21157 19:42 #navit: < tryagain> Guest21157 who you 19:42 #navit: < tryagain> are hiding from 19:42 #navit: < tryagain> :) 19:44 -!- Mineque [~Mineque@ebd76.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:45 #navit: < mvglasow> tryagain I'm just testing the Linux build, I have a text OSD element with 100% width, use_overlay not set 19:45 #navit: < mvglasow> and it shows at full width and resizes correctly 19:47 #navit: < mvglasow> wait... it displays correctly (with text) initally, but when I resize, the text disappears, the box remains 19:49 #navit: < mvglasow> weird... my initial suspicion is that you've just discovered another bug, let me switch back to vanilla r5899 and retry 19:52 #navit: < mvglasow> my initial suspicion just got confirmed 19:53 #navit: < mvglasow> you should be seeing the exact same behavior on resize on r5899 (or r5900) 19:53 #navit: < mvglasow> the only difference is the OSD item size before initial resize 19:58 #navit: < mvglasow> I'm just testing three text boxes with different values for use_overlay (0, 1 and not set) 19:58 #navit: < mvglasow> with patch, they display OK initially; after resize, the background remains (resized correctly) but the text disappears 19:59 #navit: < mvglasow> and without the patch, behavior (apart from initial size) is the exact same 20:02 #navit: < mvglasow> so I'd say my patch fixes what it's supposed to, but there's another bug on resize that needs to be looked at 20:03 #navit: < mvglasow> anyway, what's the use_overlay parameter supposed to do? 20:11 #navit: < tryagain> mvglasow use_overlay makes a separate buffer into which osd gets prerendered, so it's not has to be re-rendered each time the map moves around 20:12 #navit: < mvglasow> ah ok, though I'm not seeing any difference in behavior as far as the bug is concerned 20:13 #navit: < mvglasow> tryagain do you have a vanilla build of navit around on which you could re-run your tests? 20:13 #navit: < tryagain> no 20:14 #navit: < mvglasow> allright, can you post the XML for the OSD you tested? Then I can re-run the test on my side 20:15 #navit: < tryagain> use_overlay also makes sense when bitmap_drag parameter is set. When map is dragged, osds defined with use_overlay disappear while others are moved with map 20:16 #navit: < tryagain> 20:17 #navit: < tryagain> *drag_bitmap 20:19 #navit: < mvglasow> ok, I've added your OSD and the bug is the same with and without my patch 20:19 #navit: < mvglasow> so there's something else going wrong, somewhere in the resize code 20:20 #navit: < mvglasow> I'll take a look at it and see if I find something 20:21 -!- drlizau [~liz@billiau.net] has joined #navit 20:22 #navit: < tryagain> ok, i think current state of the patch can be commited. It has an improvement and seems to break nothing. Do you agree or want improve dynamic resizing? 20:31 #navit: < mvglasow> I'm fine with that (that's whav I was goin to suggest) 20:31 #navit: < mvglasow> and I'll look into the resize issues separately 20:36 -!- Guest21157 [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 20:36 #navit: < tryagain> mvglasow done r5901 20:36 -!- Guest21157 [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #navit 20:36 -!- Guest21157 is now known as Mineque 20:36 #navit: < Mineque> tryagain: ;) 20:37 #navit: < tryagain> ;) 20:37 #navit: < mvglasow> tryagain thanks, just updated the ticket 20:38 -!- noradtux [~noradtux@2a02:8108:28bf:fc94:2ce6:18d8:6560:7f9e] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 20:39 -!- noradtux [~noradtux@2a02:8108:28bf:fc94::1] has joined #navit 20:40 -!- Mineque_ [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #navit 20:40 -!- Mineque_ is now known as Guest66716 20:43 -!- Mineque [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 21:00 -!- jandegr [51f34cab@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.243.76.171] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 21:02 -!- drlizau [~liz@billiau.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:02 -!- _rd [~rd@p54AC7565.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 21:09 -!- Guest66716 [~Mineque@axe129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 21:16 #navit: <@KaZeR> tryagain: https://navit.ci.cloudbees.com/buildStatus/icon?job=vanilla :) 21:58 -!- tryagain [~quassel@178.216.76.36] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] --- Log closed Fri Oct 03 00:00:56 2014