[00:39:58] *** Quits: Horwitz (~mich1@p200300EC9BECC100022268FFFE64E7C4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
[00:52:54] *** Joins: Horwitz (~mich1@p200300EC9BC36700022268FFFE64E7C4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
[00:52:54] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Horwitz
[06:17:47] *** Joins: xenos1984 (~xenos1984@217.153.37.228)
[06:17:47] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v xenos1984
[06:29:31] *** Joins: naggety (~naggety@90.red-176-80-76.dynamicip.rima-tde.net)
[06:45:30] <naggety> jandegr: I'll try with osmconvert and osmium. However, I think that here there could be another kind of problem, because if I enable only Portugal map, al the north is flooded too.
[06:46:11] <jkoan> Hi naggety
[06:46:14] <naggety> I see there are some water areas just in the border between Spain and Portugal. Having the maps cut just in the border, can be this the problem?
[06:46:17] <naggety> Hi jkona
[06:46:19] <naggety> jkoan
[06:46:49] <jkoan> This is most probably due to errors in the extraction process of maps.navit-project.org
[06:47:30] <naggety> No no, this is created with maptool by myself, using data exctracted from Geofabrik
[06:47:32] <jkoan> And maps.navit-project.org is closed source unfortunately
[06:47:49] <jkoan> Oh, that's not good then
[07:57:33] *** Quits: basilic (~basilic@228-221-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
[11:33:52] *** Quits: xenos1984 (~xenos1984@217.153.37.228) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
[14:14:22] <kazer> hi there
[14:15:35] <naggety> hi kazer, what's up?
[14:22:38] *** Quits: naggety (~naggety@90.red-176-80-76.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
[17:44:10] *** Joins: ilovekiruna (~ilovekiru@ip1f12abcd.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
[17:44:10] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v ilovekiruna
[17:44:45] <ilovekiruna> hi all
[18:11:03] <kazer> hi ilovekiruna 
[18:14:27] <Mineque> Hello
[18:17:55] <ilovekiruna> hi kazer, hi Mineque
[18:36:45] <ilovekiruna> kazer: was yesterday discussing and testing a bit stf with jkoan
[18:37:08] <ilovekiruna> we figured out it would be possible to connect the phones via vpn directly by adb connect
[18:43:09] <kazer> so to a slave hosted outside? 
[18:47:33] <ilovekiruna> completely without outside slave it might be possible
[18:47:37] <ilovekiruna> we need to test a bit more
[18:47:50] <kazer> ok cool
[18:48:05] <ilovekiruna> at least i could access via vpn jkoans phone
[18:48:13] <ilovekiruna> via adb connect
[18:48:17] <ilovekiruna> from my computer
[18:48:32] <ilovekiruna> question is if we could connect to the vpn directly from the phone
[18:49:03] <ilovekiruna> still one would need a computer just to activate adb over ethernet, and this is reset when restarting the device
[18:49:03] *** Joins: jandegr (500d0b42@lneuilly-656-1-166-66.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr)
[18:49:03] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v jandegr
[18:49:47] <ilovekiruna> kazer, what I still wonder a bit, if i should secure my stf VM or move to a dedicated newly bought rpi
[18:50:20] <ilovekiruna> putting the phones directly in the vpn feels not so godo, considering that the android versions are partially pretty outdated
[18:50:26] <ilovekiruna> what do you think?
[18:52:08] <kazer> i also think that having the connection to break when the phone reboots will be very annoying
[18:57:07] <ilovekiruna> i see a second point
[18:57:21] <ilovekiruna> even if they are on wifi, they need to be kept charged anyway
[18:57:30] <ilovekiruna> so a form of cable connection is anyway required
[18:57:42] <ilovekiruna> however, ofc one would be more flexible
[19:03:36] *** Quits: jandegr (500d0b42@lneuilly-656-1-166-66.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Remote host closed the connection)
[19:16:11] <kazer> so, vpn on the slave right?
[20:31:58] *** Joins: xenos1984 (~xenos1984@217.153.37.228)
[20:31:58] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v xenos1984
[21:03:12] *** Quits: xenos1984 (~xenos1984@217.153.37.228) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
[22:40:00] <ilovekiruna> vpn used to connect master and slave